LTSER platforms as a place-based transdisciplinary research infrastructure : learning landscape approach through evaluation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Researchers

  • Per Angelstam
  • Michael Manton
  • Marine Elbakidze
  • Frans Sijtsma
  • Mihai Cristian Adamescu
  • Noa Avni
  • Pedro Beja
  • Peter Bezak
  • Iryna Zyablikova
  • Fatima Cruz
  • Vincent Bretagnolle
  • Ricardo Díaz-Delgado
  • Bruno Ens
  • Mariia Fedoriak
  • Giovanna Flaim
  • Simone Gingrich
  • Miri Lavi-Neeman
  • Sergey Medinets
  • Viesturs Melecis
  • Jose Muñoz-Rojas
  • Jessica Schäckermann
  • Andrea Stocker-Kiss
  • Heikki Setälä
  • Natalie Stryamets
  • Gaelle Tallec
  • Ulrike Tappeiner
  • Johan Törnblom
  • Taras Yamelynets

Research units

  • Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
  • Aleksandras Stulginskis University
  • University of Groningen
  • University of Bucharest
  • Dead Sea & Arava Science Center
  • University of Porto
  • University of Lisbon
  • Slovak Academy of Sciences
  • Ivan Franko National University of L'viv
  • CEBC-CNRS
  • CSIC
  • SOVON Dutch Centre for Field Ornithology
  • Chernovtsy National University
  • Istituto Agrario San Michele all'Adige
  • University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna
  • Arava Institute for Environmental Studies
  • Odessa National University
  • University of Latvia
  • University of Evora
  • Dead Sea and Arava Science Center
  • University of Helsinki
  • Nature Reserve “Roztochya”
  • Irstea
  • University of Innsbruck
  • University of Valladolid
  • Umweltbundesamt Austria GmbH
  • Eurac Research

Abstract

Context: Place-based transdisciplinary research involves multiple academic disciplines and non-academic actors. Long-Term Socio-Ecological Research (LTSER) platform is one concept with ~ 80 initiatives globally. Objectives: As an exercise in learning through evaluation we audited (1) the siting, construction and maintenance of individual LTSER platforms, and (2) them as a distributed infrastructure for place-based transdisciplinary research with focus on the European continent. Methods: First, we defined a normative model for ideal performance at both platform and network levels. Second, four surveys were sent out to the 67 self-reported LTSER platforms officially listed at the end of 2016. Third, with a focus on the network level, we analyzed the spatial distribution of both long-term ecological monitoring sites within LTSER platforms, and LTSER platforms across the European continent. Fourth, narrative biographies of 18 platforms in different stages of development were analyzed. Results: While the siting of LTSER platforms represented biogeographical regions well, variations in land use history and democratic governance were not well represented. Platform construction was based on 2.1 ecological monitoring sites, with 72% ecosystem and 28% social system research. Maintenance of a platform required three to five staff members, focused mostly on ecosystem research, was based mainly on national funding, and had 1–2 years of future funding secured. Networking with other landscape approach concepts was common. Conclusions: Individually, and as a network, LTSER platforms have good potential for transdisciplinary knowledge production and learning about sustainability challenges. To improve the range of variation of Pan-European social–ecological systems we encourage interfacing with other landscape approach concepts.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1461-1484
JournalLANDSCAPE ECOLOGY
Volume34
Issue number7
Early online date27 Nov 2018
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2019
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

    Research areas

  • Europe, Landscape approach, Learning through evaluation, Social–ecological system, Stakeholder engagement, Transdisciplinary research

Download statistics

No data available

ID: 30428365