Locally checkable proofs in distributed computing

Mika Göös, Jukka Suomela

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

28 Citations (Scopus)
65 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We study decision problems related to graph properties from the perspective of nondeterministic distributed algorithms. For a yes-instance there must exist a proof that can be verified with a distributed algorithm: all nodes must accept a valid proof, and at least one node must reject an invalid proof. We focus on locally checkable proofs that can be verified with a constant-time distributed algorithm. For example, it is easy to prove that a graph is bipartite: the locally checkable proof gives a 2-coloring of the graph, which only takes 1 bit per node. However, it is more difficult to prove that a graph is not bipartite—it turns out that any locally checkable proof requires Ω(logn) bits per node. In this paper we classify graph properties according to their local proof complexity, i. e., how many bits per node are needed in a locally checkable proof. We establish tight or neartight results for classical graph properties such as the chromatic number. We show that the local proof complexities form a natural hierarchy of complexity classes: for many classical graph properties, the local proof complexity is either 0, Θ(1), Θ(logn), or poly(n) bits per node. Among the most difficult graph properties are proving that a graph is symmetric (has a non-trivial automorphism), which requires Ω(n2) bits per node, and proving that a graph is not 3-colorable, which requires Ω(n2=logn) bits per node. Any property of connected graphs admits a trivial proof with O(n2) bits per node.
Original languageEnglish
Article number19
Pages (from-to)1–33
JournalTHEORY OF COMPUTING
Volume12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Keywords

  • Distributed computing
  • Graphs
  • Locality
  • Nondeterminism

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Locally checkable proofs in distributed computing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this