Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Imagining post-marketing : Neo-animist resource circulation and value cocreation

  • Eric Arnould*
  • , Anu Helkkula
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Hanken School of Economics

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

23 Citations (Scopus)
101 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The research question that drives this research is what kind of marketing can we imagine in a future in which the capitalist market economy is dethroned from its dominant position? The paper's purpose is thus to suggest a path to a future eco-economy (Helkkula & Arnould, 2022). These goals lead first to a succinct critique of managerial marketing's axioms; second, to a concise synthesis of neo-animist principles derived from the recent ontological turn in anthropology. From there, the paper examines three relational modes through which animists organize resource circulation and value cocreation, and contemporary manifestations of practices and systems that show the enduring significance of gifting, reciprocal exchange, and predatory symbiosis to resource circulation and value cocreation. These examples can prefigure the kind of neo-animist eco-economic system we can imagine in a post-marketing world. Directions for future research build from the strategic steps towards a neo-animist post marketing systems and the challenges identified within prefigurative experiments in post-marketing resource circulation and value cocreation.

Original languageEnglish
Article number114590
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Business Research
Volume176
Early online date1 Mar 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2024
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Keywords

  • Eco-economy
  • Gifting
  • Neo-animism
  • Reciprocal exchange
  • Resource circulation
  • Sustainability
  • Value cocreation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Imagining post-marketing : Neo-animist resource circulation and value cocreation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this