Hegemonic Academic Practices:Experiences of Publishing fromthe Periphery

S. Meriläinen, J. Tienari, Robyn Thomas, A. Davies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

99 Citations (Scopus)


Drawing on a reflexive account of a British—Finnish joint publishing experience, we suggest that institutions of academic publishing are constantly reproduced through hegemonic practices that serve to maintain and reinforce core-periphery relations between the Anglophone core and peripheral countries such as Finland. The wider academic milieu with its taxonomies of academic performance and journal quality serves to perpetuate these practices. This results in academic researchers from the periphery contributing to `othering' within the publishing process.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)584-597
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2008
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Hegemonic Academic Practices:Experiences of Publishing fromthe Periphery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this