Green fab lab applications of large-area waste polymer-based additive manufacturing

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Standard

Green fab lab applications of large-area waste polymer-based additive manufacturing. / Byard, Dennis J.; Woern, Aubrey L.; Oakley, Robert B.; Fiedler, Matthew J.; Snabes, Samantha L.; Pearce, Joshua M.

In: Additive Manufacturing, Vol. 27, 01.05.2019, p. 515-525.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Byard, Dennis J. ; Woern, Aubrey L. ; Oakley, Robert B. ; Fiedler, Matthew J. ; Snabes, Samantha L. ; Pearce, Joshua M. / Green fab lab applications of large-area waste polymer-based additive manufacturing. In: Additive Manufacturing. 2019 ; Vol. 27. pp. 515-525.

Bibtex - Download

@article{b4f891086bd54a7faabe06174d24a01a,
title = "Green fab lab applications of large-area waste polymer-based additive manufacturing",
abstract = "Fab labs, which offer small-scale distributed digital fabrication, are forming a Green Fab Lab Network, which embraces concepts of an open source symbiotic economy and circular economy patterns. With the use of industrial 3D printers capable of fused particle fabrication/ fused granular fabrication (FPF/FGF) printing directly from waste plastic streams, green fab labs could act as defacto recycling centers for converting waste plastics into valuable products for their communities. Clear financial drivers for this process have not been studied in the past. Thus, in this study the Gigabot X, an open source industrial 3D printer, which has been shown to be amenable to a wide array of recyclables for FPF/FGF 3D printing, is used to evaluate this economic potential. An economic life cycle analysis of the technology is completed comprised of three cases studies using FPF for large sporting equipment products. Sensitivities are run on the electricity costs for operation, materials costs from various feed stocks and the capacity factors of the 3D printers. The results showed that FPF/FGF 3D printing is capable of energy efficient production of a wide range of large high-value sporting goods products. In all cases, a substantial economic savings was observed when comparing the materials and energy related costs to commercial goods (even for customized goods). Using locally-sourced shredded plastic represented not only the best environmental option, but also the most economic. For the case study products analyzed even the lowest capacity factor (starting only one print per week) represented a profit when comparing to high-end value products. For some products the profit potential and return on investment was substantial (e.g. over 1000{\%}) for high capacity use of a Gigabot X. The results clearly show that open source industrial FPF/FGF 3D printers have significant economic potential when used as a distributed recycling/manufacturing system using recyclable feed stocks in the green fab lab context.",
keywords = "Circular economy, Polymers, Recycling, Upcycle, Waste plastic",
author = "Byard, {Dennis J.} and Woern, {Aubrey L.} and Oakley, {Robert B.} and Fiedler, {Matthew J.} and Snabes, {Samantha L.} and Pearce, {Joshua M.}",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.addma.2019.03.006",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "515--525",
journal = "Additive Manufacturing",
issn = "2214-8604",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

RIS - Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Green fab lab applications of large-area waste polymer-based additive manufacturing

AU - Byard, Dennis J.

AU - Woern, Aubrey L.

AU - Oakley, Robert B.

AU - Fiedler, Matthew J.

AU - Snabes, Samantha L.

AU - Pearce, Joshua M.

PY - 2019/5/1

Y1 - 2019/5/1

N2 - Fab labs, which offer small-scale distributed digital fabrication, are forming a Green Fab Lab Network, which embraces concepts of an open source symbiotic economy and circular economy patterns. With the use of industrial 3D printers capable of fused particle fabrication/ fused granular fabrication (FPF/FGF) printing directly from waste plastic streams, green fab labs could act as defacto recycling centers for converting waste plastics into valuable products for their communities. Clear financial drivers for this process have not been studied in the past. Thus, in this study the Gigabot X, an open source industrial 3D printer, which has been shown to be amenable to a wide array of recyclables for FPF/FGF 3D printing, is used to evaluate this economic potential. An economic life cycle analysis of the technology is completed comprised of three cases studies using FPF for large sporting equipment products. Sensitivities are run on the electricity costs for operation, materials costs from various feed stocks and the capacity factors of the 3D printers. The results showed that FPF/FGF 3D printing is capable of energy efficient production of a wide range of large high-value sporting goods products. In all cases, a substantial economic savings was observed when comparing the materials and energy related costs to commercial goods (even for customized goods). Using locally-sourced shredded plastic represented not only the best environmental option, but also the most economic. For the case study products analyzed even the lowest capacity factor (starting only one print per week) represented a profit when comparing to high-end value products. For some products the profit potential and return on investment was substantial (e.g. over 1000%) for high capacity use of a Gigabot X. The results clearly show that open source industrial FPF/FGF 3D printers have significant economic potential when used as a distributed recycling/manufacturing system using recyclable feed stocks in the green fab lab context.

AB - Fab labs, which offer small-scale distributed digital fabrication, are forming a Green Fab Lab Network, which embraces concepts of an open source symbiotic economy and circular economy patterns. With the use of industrial 3D printers capable of fused particle fabrication/ fused granular fabrication (FPF/FGF) printing directly from waste plastic streams, green fab labs could act as defacto recycling centers for converting waste plastics into valuable products for their communities. Clear financial drivers for this process have not been studied in the past. Thus, in this study the Gigabot X, an open source industrial 3D printer, which has been shown to be amenable to a wide array of recyclables for FPF/FGF 3D printing, is used to evaluate this economic potential. An economic life cycle analysis of the technology is completed comprised of three cases studies using FPF for large sporting equipment products. Sensitivities are run on the electricity costs for operation, materials costs from various feed stocks and the capacity factors of the 3D printers. The results showed that FPF/FGF 3D printing is capable of energy efficient production of a wide range of large high-value sporting goods products. In all cases, a substantial economic savings was observed when comparing the materials and energy related costs to commercial goods (even for customized goods). Using locally-sourced shredded plastic represented not only the best environmental option, but also the most economic. For the case study products analyzed even the lowest capacity factor (starting only one print per week) represented a profit when comparing to high-end value products. For some products the profit potential and return on investment was substantial (e.g. over 1000%) for high capacity use of a Gigabot X. The results clearly show that open source industrial FPF/FGF 3D printers have significant economic potential when used as a distributed recycling/manufacturing system using recyclable feed stocks in the green fab lab context.

KW - Circular economy

KW - Polymers

KW - Recycling

KW - Upcycle

KW - Waste plastic

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064009013&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.addma.2019.03.006

DO - 10.1016/j.addma.2019.03.006

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 515

EP - 525

JO - Additive Manufacturing

JF - Additive Manufacturing

SN - 2214-8604

ER -

ID: 33440270