Feasibility of IP-over-ICN

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Standard

Feasibility of IP-over-ICN. / Benseny, Jaume; Lagutin, Dmitrij; Hämmäinen, Heikki; Trossen, Dirk.

In: Telecommunication Systems, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex - Download

@article{220c6f52604342ea9ff1336ade408c0f,
title = "Feasibility of IP-over-ICN",
abstract = "The IP-over-ICN strategy intends to establish islands of networks that internally route packets based on Information-Centric Networking (ICN) while maintaining IP-based protocols at the ingress and egress of the network. This strategy aims at benefits from the use of ICN-based routing while maintaining backward compatibility with IP-based services. In the long run, an ICN-based Internet architecture may emerge from the interconnection of these ICN-based islands. We assess the feasibility of this strategy by discussing the willingness of Internet stakeholders to adopt one particular IP-over-ICN implementation based on the Publish-Subscribe Internet Technologies (PURSUIT) for flow-based routing, multicast routing, and service routing. We suggest that the IP-over-PURSUIT solution offers viable mechanisms for IP interoperability and routing scalability as well as potential advantages in comparison to substitutes, including IP-based solutions, such as IPv6; Multiprotocol Level Switching; and hybrid ICN; as well as other IP-over-ICN implementations based on Content-Centric Networking. We indicate that triple play operators and micro-operators have a greater incentive to adopt IP-over-PURSUIT since they can maximize the utilization of the multicast and service routing, respectively. However, we argue that IP-over-PURSUIT requires new exterior inter-stakeholder interfaces for significant operator traffic to be delivered through its new and cost-efficient routing capabilities, thus increasing the likelihood of operator adoption. Finally, we suggest that the advent of an ICN-based Internet architecture might be delayed until Internet stakeholders can trustworthily delegate the delivery of valuable content and services via information-based exchange points.",
keywords = "Feasibility, Interior gateway protocol, Internet architecture, IP-over-ICN, PURSUIT",
author = "Jaume Benseny and Dmitrij Lagutin and Heikki H{\"a}mm{\"a}inen and Dirk Trossen",
note = "Lataa OA-artikkeli, kun julkaistu. | openaire: EC/H2020/643990/EU//POINT | openaire: EC/H2020/644663/EU//RIFE",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11235-019-00593-5",
language = "English",
journal = "Telecommunication Systems",
issn = "1018-4864",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

}

RIS - Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Feasibility of IP-over-ICN

AU - Benseny, Jaume

AU - Lagutin, Dmitrij

AU - Hämmäinen, Heikki

AU - Trossen, Dirk

N1 - Lataa OA-artikkeli, kun julkaistu. | openaire: EC/H2020/643990/EU//POINT | openaire: EC/H2020/644663/EU//RIFE

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - The IP-over-ICN strategy intends to establish islands of networks that internally route packets based on Information-Centric Networking (ICN) while maintaining IP-based protocols at the ingress and egress of the network. This strategy aims at benefits from the use of ICN-based routing while maintaining backward compatibility with IP-based services. In the long run, an ICN-based Internet architecture may emerge from the interconnection of these ICN-based islands. We assess the feasibility of this strategy by discussing the willingness of Internet stakeholders to adopt one particular IP-over-ICN implementation based on the Publish-Subscribe Internet Technologies (PURSUIT) for flow-based routing, multicast routing, and service routing. We suggest that the IP-over-PURSUIT solution offers viable mechanisms for IP interoperability and routing scalability as well as potential advantages in comparison to substitutes, including IP-based solutions, such as IPv6; Multiprotocol Level Switching; and hybrid ICN; as well as other IP-over-ICN implementations based on Content-Centric Networking. We indicate that triple play operators and micro-operators have a greater incentive to adopt IP-over-PURSUIT since they can maximize the utilization of the multicast and service routing, respectively. However, we argue that IP-over-PURSUIT requires new exterior inter-stakeholder interfaces for significant operator traffic to be delivered through its new and cost-efficient routing capabilities, thus increasing the likelihood of operator adoption. Finally, we suggest that the advent of an ICN-based Internet architecture might be delayed until Internet stakeholders can trustworthily delegate the delivery of valuable content and services via information-based exchange points.

AB - The IP-over-ICN strategy intends to establish islands of networks that internally route packets based on Information-Centric Networking (ICN) while maintaining IP-based protocols at the ingress and egress of the network. This strategy aims at benefits from the use of ICN-based routing while maintaining backward compatibility with IP-based services. In the long run, an ICN-based Internet architecture may emerge from the interconnection of these ICN-based islands. We assess the feasibility of this strategy by discussing the willingness of Internet stakeholders to adopt one particular IP-over-ICN implementation based on the Publish-Subscribe Internet Technologies (PURSUIT) for flow-based routing, multicast routing, and service routing. We suggest that the IP-over-PURSUIT solution offers viable mechanisms for IP interoperability and routing scalability as well as potential advantages in comparison to substitutes, including IP-based solutions, such as IPv6; Multiprotocol Level Switching; and hybrid ICN; as well as other IP-over-ICN implementations based on Content-Centric Networking. We indicate that triple play operators and micro-operators have a greater incentive to adopt IP-over-PURSUIT since they can maximize the utilization of the multicast and service routing, respectively. However, we argue that IP-over-PURSUIT requires new exterior inter-stakeholder interfaces for significant operator traffic to be delivered through its new and cost-efficient routing capabilities, thus increasing the likelihood of operator adoption. Finally, we suggest that the advent of an ICN-based Internet architecture might be delayed until Internet stakeholders can trustworthily delegate the delivery of valuable content and services via information-based exchange points.

KW - Feasibility

KW - Interior gateway protocol

KW - Internet architecture

KW - IP-over-ICN

KW - PURSUIT

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070084786&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11235-019-00593-5

DO - 10.1007/s11235-019-00593-5

M3 - Article

JO - Telecommunication Systems

JF - Telecommunication Systems

SN - 1018-4864

ER -

ID: 36052616