TY - JOUR
T1 - Erratum: An inverse backscatter problem for electric impedance tomography
AU - Hanke, Martin
AU - Hyvönen, Nuutti
AU - Reusswig, Stefanie
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - We fix an incorrect statement from our paper [M. Hanke, N. Hyvönen, and S. Reusswig, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 41 (2009), pp. 1948-1966] claiming that two different perfectly conducting inclusions necessarily have different backscatter in impedance tomography. We also present a counterexample to show that this kind of nonuniqueness does indeed occur.
AB - We fix an incorrect statement from our paper [M. Hanke, N. Hyvönen, and S. Reusswig, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 41 (2009), pp. 1948-1966] claiming that two different perfectly conducting inclusions necessarily have different backscatter in impedance tomography. We also present a counterexample to show that this kind of nonuniqueness does indeed occur.
KW - Backscatter
KW - Electric impedance tomography
KW - Uniqueness theorem
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960383934&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1137/110821780
DO - 10.1137/110821780
M3 - Article
VL - 43
SP - 1495
EP - 1497
JO - SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis
JF - SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis
SN - 0036-1410
IS - 3
ER -