Erratum: An inverse backscatter problem for electric impedance tomography
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Scientific › peer-review
Researchers
Research units
- Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
Abstract
We fix an incorrect statement from our paper [M. Hanke, N. Hyvönen, and S. Reusswig, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 41 (2009), pp. 1948-1966] claiming that two different perfectly conducting inclusions necessarily have different backscatter in impedance tomography. We also present a counterexample to show that this kind of nonuniqueness does indeed occur.
Details
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1495-1497 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Publication status | Published - 2011 |
| MoE publication type | A1 Journal article-refereed |
- Backscatter, Electric impedance tomography, Uniqueness theorem
Research areas
ID: 3227059
