Erratum: An inverse backscatter problem for electric impedance tomography

Martin Hanke*, Nuutti Hyvönen, Stefanie Reusswig

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review


We fix an incorrect statement from our paper [M. Hanke, N. Hyvönen, and S. Reusswig, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 41 (2009), pp. 1948-1966] claiming that two different perfectly conducting inclusions necessarily have different backscatter in impedance tomography. We also present a counterexample to show that this kind of nonuniqueness does indeed occur.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1495-1497
Number of pages3
JournalSIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2011
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed


  • Backscatter
  • Electric impedance tomography
  • Uniqueness theorem

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Erratum: An inverse backscatter problem for electric impedance tomography'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this