Erratum: An inverse backscatter problem for electric impedance tomography

Martin Hanke; Nuutti Hyvönen; Stefanie Reusswig

doi:10.1137/110821780

Erratum: An inverse backscatter problem for electric impedance tomography

Martin Hanke^*, Nuutti Hyvönen, Stefanie Reusswig

^*Corresponding author for this work

Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Scientific › peer-review

Abstract

We fix an incorrect statement from our paper [M. Hanke, N. Hyvönen, and S. Reusswig, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 41 (2009), pp. 1948-1966] claiming that two different perfectly conducting inclusions necessarily have different backscatter in impedance tomography. We also present a counterexample to show that this kind of nonuniqueness does indeed occur.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1495-1497
Number of pages	3
Journal	SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis
Volume	43
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1137/110821780
Publication status	Published - 2011
MoE publication type	A1 Journal article-refereed

Keywords

Backscatter
Electric impedance tomography
Uniqueness theorem

Access to Document

10.1137/110821780

Cite this

@article{e78181f30fc7421fb17c2976a4622c99,

title = "Erratum: An inverse backscatter problem for electric impedance tomography",

abstract = "We fix an incorrect statement from our paper [M. Hanke, N. Hyv{\"o}nen, and S. Reusswig, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 41 (2009), pp. 1948-1966] claiming that two different perfectly conducting inclusions necessarily have different backscatter in impedance tomography. We also present a counterexample to show that this kind of nonuniqueness does indeed occur.",

keywords = "Backscatter, Electric impedance tomography, Uniqueness theorem",

author = "Martin Hanke and Nuutti Hyv{\"o}nen and Stefanie Reusswig",

year = "2011",

doi = "10.1137/110821780",

language = "English",

volume = "43",

pages = "1495--1497",

journal = "SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis",

issn = "0036-1410",

publisher = "Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Erratum: An inverse backscatter problem for electric impedance tomography

AU - Hanke, Martin

AU - Hyvönen, Nuutti

AU - Reusswig, Stefanie

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - We fix an incorrect statement from our paper [M. Hanke, N. Hyvönen, and S. Reusswig, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 41 (2009), pp. 1948-1966] claiming that two different perfectly conducting inclusions necessarily have different backscatter in impedance tomography. We also present a counterexample to show that this kind of nonuniqueness does indeed occur.

AB - We fix an incorrect statement from our paper [M. Hanke, N. Hyvönen, and S. Reusswig, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 41 (2009), pp. 1948-1966] claiming that two different perfectly conducting inclusions necessarily have different backscatter in impedance tomography. We also present a counterexample to show that this kind of nonuniqueness does indeed occur.

KW - Backscatter

KW - Electric impedance tomography

KW - Uniqueness theorem

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960383934&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1137/110821780

DO - 10.1137/110821780

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79960383934

SN - 0036-1410

VL - 43

SP - 1495

EP - 1497

JO - SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis

JF - SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis

IS - 3

ER -

Erratum: An inverse backscatter problem for electric impedance tomography

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this