Energy scenario choices: Insights from a retrospective review of UK energy futures

Evelina Trutnevyte*, Will McDowall, Julia Tomei, Ilkka Keppo

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview Articlepeer-review

48 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Since the 1980s, there has been a shift in energy research. It has shifted from approaches that forecast or project the future to approaches which make more tentative claims and which explore several plausible scenarios. Due to multiple uncertainties in energy systems, there is an infinite amount of plausible scenarios that could be constructed and scenario developers therefore choose smaller, more tangible sets of scenarios to analyse. Yet, it is often unclear how and why this scenario choice is made and how such choices might be improved. This paper presents a retrospective analysis of twelve UK energy scenarios developed between 1978 and 2002. It investigates how specific scenarios were chosen and whether these choices captured the actual UK energy system transition. It finds that scenario choice reflected contemporary debates, leading to a focus on certain issues and limiting the insights gleaned from these exercises. The paper argues for multi-organisation, multi-method and multi-scenario approaches to the development of energy scenarios to capture the wide range of insights on offer. Rather than focus on uncertainty in model parameters, greater reflection on structural uncertainties, such as shifts in energy governance, is also required.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)326-337
Number of pages12
JournalRenewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Volume55
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2016
MoE publication typeA2 Review article in a scientific journal

Keywords

  • Energy scenarios
  • Historical analysis
  • Modelling
  • Retrospective analysis
  • Scenario choice

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Energy scenario choices: Insights from a retrospective review of UK energy futures'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this