Abstract
Firms can adjust their convertibles to be more debt-like or equity-like through several contract terms. In particular, by providing call protection, a convertible issuer can assure its convertible bondholders that it will not force them to become equity holders during the call protection period. The possibility of a forced conversion instituted by an early call should be more threatening to investors in an economy where local laws are biased against shareholders. I examine call protection terms in an international sample and find evidence consistent with the hypothesis that convertible bond design varies based on the features of local law.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 809-831 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Journal | Journal of Corporate Finance |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2005 |
| MoE publication type | A1 Journal article-refereed |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Keywords
- Call protection
- Convertible securities
- International
- Law
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of law on corporate financing practices - International evidence from convertible bond issues'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver