Abstract
The effectiveness of public policy measures in creating energy impacts were investigated through 20 policy cases on renewable energy and efficient energy use. The policies were grouped into subsidy-type and catalyzing measures based on the use of the public financial resources. The policy cost of subsidies ranged from 1 EURO/MWh up to over 100 EURO/MWh, the feed-in tariffs being clearly the most expensive choice. The public measures that strive for catalyzing market breakthroughs lie in the range 0.1-1 EURO/MWh, but some business driven and procurement type measures could come down to even 0.01 EURO/MWh. The policy costs observed could decrease by 25-60% if accounting for lagging energy impacts. The better policy efficiency of catalytic measures is most likely due to a stronger market and business sensitiveness, understanding of market needs, and focusing more on the end-use sector with active stakeholder involvement. The magnitude of the energy impacts were in average larger from the subsidy instruments but a few end-use technologies linked to catalytic measures reached even higher effects due to the strong market penetration achieved. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 627-639 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Energy Policy |
Volume | 35 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jan 2007 |
MoE publication type | A1 Journal article-refereed |
Keywords
- policy cost
- policy measures
- energy impacts
- CHINA