Abstract
This paper examines the economic consequences of goodwill write-offs under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 (SFAS 142). Although write-off firms have performed poorly, it is evident that deteriorating economic performance explains only a small proportion of write-offs. After controlling for endogeneity of write-off choice, I fail to find evidence that investors and analysts fixate on SFAS 142 goodwill write-offs. I also provide evidence that write-off firms pay higher audit fees, suggesting that auditors charge higher fees in response to extra audit effort. These results are consistent with the principles of market efficiency, analyst-forecast rationality and efficient audit pricing.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 211-235 |
Number of pages | 25 |
Journal | Accounting and Finance |
Volume | 54 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Mar 2014 |
MoE publication type | A1 Journal article-refereed |
Keywords
- Audit fees
- Conditional conservatism
- Fair-value accounting
- Market efficiency
- Propensity score matching