Digging Deeper into the Finnish Parliamentary Protocols – Using a Lexical Semantic Tagger for Studying Meaning Change of Everyman’s Rights (allemansrätten)

Kimmo Kettunen, Matti la Mela

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articleScientificpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
14 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper analyses the protocols of the Parliament of Finland 1907–2000. They have been digitised and published as open data by the Finnish Parliament in 20181. In the analysis we use a novel tool, a semantic tagger for Finnish – FiST [1]. We describe the tagger generally and show results of seman-tic analysis both on the whole of the parliamentary corpus and on a small subset of data where everyman’s rights (a widely used right of public access to nature) have been the main topic of parliamentary discussions. Our analysis contributes to the understanding of the development of this “tradition” of public access rights, and is also the first study utilizing the Finnish semantic tagger as a tool for content analysis in digital humanities research. Keyword search shows first that that the discussion of everyman’s rights has had three different peak peri-ods in the Finnish Parliament: 1946, 1973, and 1992. Secondly, the contents of the discussions have different nature for all the periods, which could be clearly detected with FiST and keyness analysis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)63-80
Number of pages18
JournalCEUR Workshop Proceedings
Volume2612
Publication statusPublished - 2020
MoE publication typeA4 Article in a conference publication
EventDigital Humanities in the Nordic Countries - Riga, Latvia
Duration: 21 Oct 202023 Oct 2020
Conference number: 5

Keywords

  • Allemansrätten
  • Everyman’s Rights
  • Parliament of Finland
  • Parliamentary Proceedings
  • Semantic Tagging

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Digging Deeper into the Finnish Parliamentary Protocols – Using a Lexical Semantic Tagger for Studying Meaning Change of Everyman’s Rights (allemansrätten)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this