Developing balancing practices to overcome institutional voids in Tanzanian forest sector management

This article shows how fundamental diverging issues between key actors in base of the pyramid (BOP) markets enlarge institutional voids, and how intermediaries can aim to bridge such voids through the development of balancing practices. From an empirical vantage point we identify three institutional voids – lack of knowhow, standards and value chains – hampering the development of Tanzanian forestry. We analyse these voids in relation to stakeholders’ differing conceptions about the system in which they operate, the optimal time frame of operations, and the required quality of wood processing and products. Fundamental diverging issues stem from deeply held socio-cultural conceptions that are difficult, but not impossible, to change. The article shows how the imbalance between subsistence, market and development logics further adds to the institutional voids and thus produces and maintains inefficiencies in forestry, holding back the whole sector. Institutional voids and inefficient practices are among the mechanisms that are keeping the local poor people locked in poverty. The article illustrates how an intermediary organization can proactively develop more sustainable informal practices that ease the problem of institutional voids and gradually resolve inefficiencies. The development of new practices is based on the idea of balancing between competing logics in different everyday situations. Balancing practices synthesize divergent conceptions, clarify the operational environment and improve learning. Once sufficiently developed, new practices may gradually become institutionalized, providing an opportunity for the whole institutional structure to reproduce itself. Based on the analysis presented, the article puts forward a model describing the dynamics between institutional voids, logics, fundamental diverging issues and proactive balancing. The results contribute to a deeper understanding of the root causes underlying institutional voids in BOP markets.

Figures
References
Related
Details

Vol. 2018, No. 1
Permissions

Permissions
Metrics

Downloaded 0 times
History

Published online 9 July 2018
Published in print 1 July 2018

Information

Copyright of Academy of Management Proceedings is the property of Academy of Management and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. The Academy of Management does not maintain the full text version of papers presented at the Academy's meetings. Please contact the author(s) directly to obtain access to the full text content.
Keywords
AOM Annual Meeting Proceedings 2018
AOM Chicago 2018