Corrigendum to “High-cycle fatigue model calibration with a deterministic optimization approach” (International Journal of Fatigue (2023) 175, (S0142112323002487), (10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.107747))

Arturo Rubio Ruiz*, Timo Saksala, Djebar Baroudi, Mikko Hokka, Reijo Kouhia

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debateScientificpeer-review

8 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The authors regret an error in Fig. 7a of the original paper after it was published. Such Figure shows a comparison between experimental and numerically predicted S-N curves of the 7075-T6 aluminum alloy obtained under uniaxial tension-compression with different stress ratios, and pure torsion. The legend in the original plot presents mistaken values of the stress ratios included in the study, and the corrected Figure is shown below.[Formula presented] Fig. 1. Comparison between experimental and numerically predicted S-N curves of the 7075-T6 aluminum alloy obtained under uniaxial tension-compression with different stress ratios (R), and pure torsion. The solid triangles pointing to the right represent run-out data points. It is noteworthy that only the legend of the plot was mistaken, all the calculations and data correspond with the correct values of the stress ratio, so all the conclusions of the original paper hold true. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.

Original languageEnglish
Article number107862
JournalINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FATIGUE
Volume176
Early online date4 Aug 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2023
MoE publication typeNot Eligible

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Corrigendum to “High-cycle fatigue model calibration with a deterministic optimization approach” (International Journal of Fatigue (2023) 175, (S0142112323002487), (10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.107747))'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this