Comparison of Simplistic System-Level RIS Models and Diffraction-Theory Solutions

Le Hao*, Francisco S. Cuesta, Sergei A. Tretyakov

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference article in proceedingsScientificpeer-review

31 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We discuss and compare two recently published path-loss models for reconfigurable intelligent surfaces (RIS) derived from the electromagnetic and communication theory points of view. The electromagnetic model considers the RIS as a whole, taking into account field interactions of all metasurface elements, whereas the communication model is based on an assumption that each array element is an independent relay. The estimations given by the two models are rather different but, surprisingly, we find that the simplistic model gives the same result as the electromagnetic calculation for perfectly functioning anomalous reflectors if one replaces the effective areas of the unit cells by their geometrical areas, scaled by the corresponding angular factors. Simulation results validate our analysis and show the numerical differences between the two models when we vary the frequency and the number of elements in RISs.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication18th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation, EuCAP 2024
PublisherEurAAP
ISBN (Electronic)978-88-31299-09-1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024
MoE publication typeA4 Conference publication
EventEuropean Conference on Antennas and Propagation - Glasgow, United Kingdom
Duration: 17 Mar 202422 Mar 2024
Conference number: 18

Conference

ConferenceEuropean Conference on Antennas and Propagation
Abbreviated titleEuCAP
Country/TerritoryUnited Kingdom
CityGlasgow
Period17/03/202422/03/2024

Keywords

  • Intelligent Reflecting Surface (IRS)
  • path-loss model
  • Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface (RIS)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of Simplistic System-Level RIS Models and Diffraction-Theory Solutions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this