Comparison of numerical techniques for the evaluation of human exposure from measurement data

Alice Conchin Gubernati; Fabio Freschi; Luca Giaccone; Tommaso Campi; Valerio De Santis; Ilkka Laakso

doi:10.1109/TMAG.2019.2896720

Comparison of numerical techniques for the evaluation of human exposure from measurement data

Alice Conchin Gubernati^*, Fabio Freschi, Luca Giaccone, Tommaso Campi, Valerio De Santis, Ilkka Laakso

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Scientific › peer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Numerical dosimetry makes it possible to evaluate the influence of electromagnetic fields on the human body. The interest of performing numerical dosimetry starting from data coming from general purpose software or measurements is constantly growing. This paper compares two available methods that make dosimetry starting from the knowledge of the magnetic flux density. The quality of results is analyzed considering both exact and uncertain inputs stressing out when one method should be preferred over the other. Finally, the methods are validated using real measurements obtaining good results.

Original language	English
Article number	5000404
Number of pages	4
Journal	IEEE Transactions on Magnetics
Volume	55
Issue number	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2019.2896720
Publication status	Published - 1 Jun 2019
MoE publication type	A1 Journal article-refereed

Keywords

Computational electromagnetics
Human exposure
Low-frequency (LF) magnetic fields
Magnetic measurements

Access to Document

10.1109/TMAG.2019.2896720

Cite this

@article{a3ba0cfb5b464b78a2d577e20ffb57a7,

title = "Comparison of numerical techniques for the evaluation of human exposure from measurement data",

abstract = "Numerical dosimetry makes it possible to evaluate the influence of electromagnetic fields on the human body. The interest of performing numerical dosimetry starting from data coming from general purpose software or measurements is constantly growing. This paper compares two available methods that make dosimetry starting from the knowledge of the magnetic flux density. The quality of results is analyzed considering both exact and uncertain inputs stressing out when one method should be preferred over the other. Finally, the methods are validated using real measurements obtaining good results.",

keywords = "Computational electromagnetics, Human exposure, Low-frequency (LF) magnetic fields, Magnetic measurements",

author = "{Conchin Gubernati}, Alice and Fabio Freschi and Luca Giaccone and Tommaso Campi and {De Santis}, Valerio and Ilkka Laakso",

year = "2019",

month = jun,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1109/TMAG.2019.2896720",

language = "English",

volume = "55",

journal = "IEEE Transactions on Magnetics",

issn = "0018-9464",

publisher = "IEEE",

number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of numerical techniques for the evaluation of human exposure from measurement data

AU - Conchin Gubernati, Alice

AU - Freschi, Fabio

AU - Giaccone, Luca

AU - Campi, Tommaso

AU - De Santis, Valerio

AU - Laakso, Ilkka

PY - 2019/6/1

Y1 - 2019/6/1

N2 - Numerical dosimetry makes it possible to evaluate the influence of electromagnetic fields on the human body. The interest of performing numerical dosimetry starting from data coming from general purpose software or measurements is constantly growing. This paper compares two available methods that make dosimetry starting from the knowledge of the magnetic flux density. The quality of results is analyzed considering both exact and uncertain inputs stressing out when one method should be preferred over the other. Finally, the methods are validated using real measurements obtaining good results.

AB - Numerical dosimetry makes it possible to evaluate the influence of electromagnetic fields on the human body. The interest of performing numerical dosimetry starting from data coming from general purpose software or measurements is constantly growing. This paper compares two available methods that make dosimetry starting from the knowledge of the magnetic flux density. The quality of results is analyzed considering both exact and uncertain inputs stressing out when one method should be preferred over the other. Finally, the methods are validated using real measurements obtaining good results.

KW - Computational electromagnetics

KW - Human exposure

KW - Low-frequency (LF) magnetic fields

KW - Magnetic measurements

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065923109&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/TMAG.2019.2896720

DO - 10.1109/TMAG.2019.2896720

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85065923109

SN - 0018-9464

VL - 55

JO - IEEE Transactions on Magnetics

JF - IEEE Transactions on Magnetics

IS - 6

M1 - 5000404

ER -

Comparison of numerical techniques for the evaluation of human exposure from measurement data

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this