Abstract
In this paper a comparison of some of the methods available for solving mixed integer non-linear programming (MINLP) problems is presented. Since some methods solve both a mixed integer linear programming (MILP) master problem and non-linear programming (NLP) subproblems during the iterations, while others only solve MILP master problems, a comparison of the computer resources needed for the optimization is presented. The methods are applied on a number of significant chemical engineering problems involving both MINLP problems (with a variety in the degree of discreteness and complexity) and some strict integer non-linear programming (INLP) problems. From the results, it is to be seen that a comparison of only the number of iterations needed in the optimization, doesn't allways measure the actual required resources of the optimization.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Computers and Chemical Engineering |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue number | SUPPL.1 |
| Publication status | Published - 1996 |
| MoE publication type | A2 Review article in a scientific journal |
Keywords
- Design Optimization
- INLP
- Mathematical Programming
- MILP
- MINLP
- Optimization
- Process Integration
- Process Synthesis