Comparison of China's environmental impact assessment (EIA) law with the European Union (EU) EIA directive

Qiaoling Chen, Yuanzhi Zhang*, Ari Ekroos

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview Articlepeer-review

    12 Citations (Scopus)


    In this paper, we first review the development of China's Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) system in the past 30 years. Then we compare the framework and operational procedures of China's new EIA law with those of the EU EIA Directive. We also compare public participation, as well as sanctions and control in the two EIA systems. In addition, we identify where the processes in both EIA systems are similar or different from one another. By comparison, we noted that there are at least three obvious weaknesses in China's EIA system: (1) the application of new models for EIA legislation; (2) the improvement of EIA guidance and education; and (3) the enhancement of public participation in EIA process. Our study indicates that these three major shortcomings should be overcome and improved in China's EIA system, when compared with the EU EIA system.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)53-65
    Number of pages13
    JournalEnvironmental Monitoring and Assessment
    Issue number1-3
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2007
    MoE publication typeA2 Review article in a scientific journal


    • China EIA law
    • EIA process
    • Environmental impact assessment (EIA)
    • Environmental protection
    • EU EIA directive
    • Strategic environmental assessment (SEA)


    Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of China's environmental impact assessment (EIA) law with the European Union (EU) EIA directive'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this