Comparison of Anisotropic Energy-Based and Jiles–Atherton Models of Ferromagnetic Hysteresis

Brijesh Upadhaya, Paavo Rasilo, Lauri Perkkiö, Paul Handgruber, Anouar Belahcen, Antero Arkkio

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
94 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this article, we apply an anisotropic extension for the energy-based and the Jiles–Atherton (JA) hysteresis models to simulate both unidirectional alternating and rotational magnetic field excitations. The results show a good agreement with measurements for unidirectional alternating fields. However, the results for rotational fields, especially at high magnitudes, show a significant discrepancy with the measurement data. We demonstrate that the JA model with appropriate parameters can estimate the losses in alternating cases up to 1.5 T, whereas both models give reasonable loss estimation up to 1 T in rotational cases.
Original languageEnglish
Article number8956032
Number of pages7
JournalIEEE Transactions on Magnetics
Volume56
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Keywords

  • Energy-based (EB) model
  • Energy-based Jiles–Atherton (JA) model
  • Magnetic hysteresis
  • Non-oriented (NO) electrical steel

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of Anisotropic Energy-Based and Jiles–Atherton Models of Ferromagnetic Hysteresis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this