Comparative analysis of coupling modularity metrics

Katja Hölttä-Otto*, Noemi A. Chiriac, Dusan Lysy, Eun Suk Suh

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperScientific

61 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Modular design has become a widely accepted developmental strategy to create products and systems that can be easily manufactured, upgraded and maintained. In order to achieve these benefits through improvement of a system's modularity, it must be measured. An ideal measure ought to capture modularity while being independent of other architectural factors such as size, system coupling density or the number of modules. In this work, we review past research on modularity measures. Eight modularity measures are selected for a detailed analysis. We use a design of experiments approach to analyse which metrics best measure the degree of modularity independent of other irrelevant factors. To do this, we conduct a factorial analysis of 24 canonical architectures with idealised modularity, including precisely integral, modular and bus architectures. We find that most measures produce inconsistent results, especially if the system architecture contains a bus or modules with loose internal coupling. We identify the metrics that are able to capture the degree of modularity in the most consistent manner.

Original languageEnglish
Pages787-803
Number of pages17
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2012

Keywords

  • complex systems
  • metrics
  • modularity
  • product architecture

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative analysis of coupling modularity metrics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this