Abstract
Modularization has recently attracted considerable interest among academics and practitioners. In the construction industry, several modular solutions have been introduced and examined; however, hardly any study comprehensively classifies the different modularization strategies according to their possibility to achieve various objectives of building investments. This research aims to develop a framework for identifying and classifying modularization strategies in construction according to their suitability to achieve the specific outcomes intended for a building or its subsystem. Using the literature on product modularity, product platforms and production strategies as a basis, this study has developed a theoretical framework that proposes connections between the main objectives of a building investment and the dimensions of modularization strategies. The framework is elaborated by testing the propositions, based on an empirical analysis of nine real-life case studies. The findings reveal that modularization can be a suitable approach to develop an innovative design solution; improve a project’s quality, cost and schedule performance; and enable flexibility in building use and maintenance. However, suggestions for achieving these objectives vary from project organization-driven to collaborative, integrated or supplier-driven modularization strategies. Developers, owners, contractors and module suppliers can use the framework when positioning and developing their roles in the construction supply chain.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 32-48 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | Construction Management and Economics |
Volume | 36 |
Issue number | 1 |
Early online date | Jul 2017 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2 Jan 2018 |
MoE publication type | A1 Journal article-refereed |
Keywords
- building investment
- Modularization strategy
- product architecture
- product platform
- production system