TY - JOUR
T1 - Carbon Nanotubes versus Graphene as Flexible Transparent Electrodes in Inverted Perovskite Solar Cells
AU - Jeon, Il
AU - Yoon, Jungjin
AU - Ahn, Namyoung
AU - Atwa, Mohamed
AU - Delacou, Clement
AU - Anisimov, Anton
AU - Kauppinen, Esko I.
AU - Choi, Mansoo
AU - Maruyama, Shigeo
AU - Matsuo, Yutaka
PY - 2017/11/2
Y1 - 2017/11/2
N2 - Transparent carbon electrodes, carbon nanotubes, and graphene were used as the bottom electrode in flexible inverted perovskite solar cells. Their photovoltaic performance and mechanical resilience were compared and analyzed using various techniques. Whereas a conventional inverted perovskite solar cells using indium tin oxide showed a power conversion efficiency of 17.8%, the carbon nanotube- and graphene-based cells showed efficiencies of 12.8% and 14.2%, respectively. An established MoO3 doping was used for carbon electrode-based devices. The difference in the photovoltaic performance between the carbon nanotube- and graphene-based cells was due to the difference in morphology and transmittance. Raman spectroscopy, and cyclic flexural testing revealed that the graphene-based cells were more susceptible to strain than the carbon nanotube-based cells, though the difference was marginal. Overall, despite higher performance, the transfer step for graphene has lower reproducibility. Thus, the development of better graphene transfer methods would help maximize the current capacity of graphene-based cells.
AB - Transparent carbon electrodes, carbon nanotubes, and graphene were used as the bottom electrode in flexible inverted perovskite solar cells. Their photovoltaic performance and mechanical resilience were compared and analyzed using various techniques. Whereas a conventional inverted perovskite solar cells using indium tin oxide showed a power conversion efficiency of 17.8%, the carbon nanotube- and graphene-based cells showed efficiencies of 12.8% and 14.2%, respectively. An established MoO3 doping was used for carbon electrode-based devices. The difference in the photovoltaic performance between the carbon nanotube- and graphene-based cells was due to the difference in morphology and transmittance. Raman spectroscopy, and cyclic flexural testing revealed that the graphene-based cells were more susceptible to strain than the carbon nanotube-based cells, though the difference was marginal. Overall, despite higher performance, the transfer step for graphene has lower reproducibility. Thus, the development of better graphene transfer methods would help maximize the current capacity of graphene-based cells.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032813236&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b02229
DO - 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b02229
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85032813236
SN - 1948-7185
VL - 8
SP - 5395
EP - 5401
JO - Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
JF - Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
IS - 21
ER -