Can Gender Parity Break the Glass Ceiling? Evidence from a Repeated Randomized Experiment

Manuel Fernandez Bagues, Berta Esteve-Volart

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

This paper studies whether the gender composition of recruiting committees matters. We make use of the unique evidence provided by Spanish public examinations, where the allocation of candidates to evaluating committees is random. We analyse how the chances of success of 150,000 female and male candidates for positions in the four main Corps of the Spanish Judiciary from 1987 to 2007 were affected by the gender composition of their evaluation committee. We find that a female (male) candidate is significantly less likely to be hired whenever she (he) is randomly assigned to a committee where the share of female (male) evaluators is relatively greater. Evidence from multiple choice tests suggests that this is due to the fact that female majority committees overestimate the quality of male candidates.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1301 – 1328
JournalReview of economic studies
Volume77
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Can Gender Parity Break the Glass Ceiling? Evidence from a Repeated Randomized Experiment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this