Can Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy be Replaced by Direct Current Techniques in Battery Diagnosis?

Jia Guo, Yaolin Xu*, Pengwei Li, Kjeld Pedersen, Miran Gaberšček, Daniel Ioan Stroe*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

15 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), a conventional and alternating-current-(AC)-based technique for impedance measurement, is commonly used in battery diagnosis. However, it requires expensive equipment and demanding operating conditions and is complex and model-dependent in data analysis. Recently, novel direct current (DC) analytics have emerged as an alternative to EIS. They are simple yet powerful, being capable of revealing impedance information that traditionally could only be obtained through EIS and determining Li-ion diffusion coefficient. Besides, a complete EIS spectrum can be predicted based on constant current charging curves in the support of machine learning methods. This work highlights the similarities and discrepancies between DC techniques and EIS in the electrochemical analysis of Li-ion batteries. Looking ahead, DC techniques may be a promising substitute for EIS in future battery diagnosis, requiring simplified equipment while offering a deep understanding of battery impedance and its underlying electrochemical processes.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere202400528
JournalChemPhysChem
Volume25
Issue number21
Early online date2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Nov 2024
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Keywords

  • Battery diagnosis
  • Constant current technique
  • Direct current (DC) impedance
  • Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Can Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy be Replaced by Direct Current Techniques in Battery Diagnosis?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this