Abstract
The two high-resolution global gravity field models, EGM2008 and EIGEN-6C, are compared with ground truth in Finland and surrounding areas. Thereafter, the models are used as background models in the calculation of a quasi-geoid model for Finland. The differences between height anomalies calculated from the globalmodels and from two GPSlevelling datasets for Finland show standard deviations between 5 and 7 cm. Comparisons with free-air anomalies show small and homogeneously distributed differences over most of the area. In both comparisons the largest discrepancies are found close to the Russian border east of the 29° longitude line. This is most probably due to lower resolution Russian data used in the global models. When the global models are used as background models in the calculation of a quasi-geoid model for Finland, the problems around the 29° longitude line disappear. Comparison between the final quasi-geoid models and GPS-levelling data show an improvement over earlier models for Finland.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Gravity, Geoid and Height Systems - IAG Symposium GGHS2012, Proceedings |
Publisher | Springer Verlag |
Pages | 51-58 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Volume | 141 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9783319108360 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2014 |
MoE publication type | A4 Article in a conference publication |
Event | INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF GEODESY SYMPOSIA - Duration: 1 Jan 1900 → … |
Conference
Conference | INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF GEODESY SYMPOSIA |
---|---|
Period | 01/01/1900 → … |
Keywords
- EGM2008
- EIGEN-6C
- GPS-levelling
- Quasi-geoid modelling