Analyses of Beamspace MIMO Channels at 142GHz

Mar Francis De Guzman, Nuutti Tervo, Pekka Kyosti, Katsuyuki Haneda

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

68 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This letter presents the analyses of a single-user beamspace multiple-input-multiple-output (MIMO) on measured indoor and outdoor channels at 142 GHz. The rank is evaluated under different antenna sizes, number of beams, and thresholds. We assume a total power constraint at the transmitter that results in a decrease in a signal-to-noise ratio as the link distance increases. When using spatial multiplexing, the indoor and outdoor sites demonstrate an average capacity gain of 2× and 1.5× at link distances below 60 m. Also, the rank for our measured 142 GHz channels is comparable to that at 60 GHz channels but significantly lower than the rank at 5 GHz channels reported in the literature. We also found that at 142 GHz, the indoor and outdoor sites have median ranks of 3.0 and 1.7 for the small-antenna case, and 4.9 and 2.4 for the large-antenna case assuming a rank threshold of 20 dB. The indoor site has a rank higher by 1.8 than the outdoor site, regardless of the antenna size. The rank decreases by only 20% and 15% for indoor and outdoor scenarios when the beam density is halved, allowing a significant reduction in implementation complexity of the beamspace MIMO without remarkably reducing the rank.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)359-363
Number of pages5
JournalIEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters
Volume23
Issue number1
Early online date2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2024
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Keywords

  • Antenna measurements
  • Antennas
  • Beamspace
  • Delays
  • Directive antennas
  • MIMO
  • MIMO communication
  • Phased arrays
  • propagation
  • Space division multiplexing
  • spatial multiplexing
  • sub-terahertz

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Analyses of Beamspace MIMO Channels at 142GHz'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this