Abstract
The calibration of building energy model is a vital part of the whole modelling process. To improve the efficiency of this work, an automation procedure has recently been introduced to the calibration process, but no generic approach has yet received the consensus of the whole community at present. The main reason is that a purely mathematics-based, automated calibration lacks physical explanation, which means that the calibrated model probably has a large error in certain single physical values despite a good overall agreement with the measurement data.
In this study, the authors design a set of procedures to automatize the calibration process of building energy model based on schedule tuning and signed directed graph (SDG) method, which codifies human experience and logic and incorporates them into the modules of computational calibration to combine the advantages of traditional and automated approach. The specific operations of calibration process are introduced through a case study. In this case, a building energy model with relatively low accuracy is finally well calibrated. The CV(RMSE) (Coefficient of Variation of Root Mean Square Error) of the original model is 42.12% for power consumption and 25.50% for gas consumption; and for the calibrated model, the CV(RMSE) is 2.21% for power consumption and 3.15% for gas consumption. In addition, the same operations are also applied to another case for further verification. In this case, the final CV(RMSE) of power consumption is reduced to 2.19% from 19.25%. This significant result reveals the applicability and effectiveness of the automated process.
In this study, the authors design a set of procedures to automatize the calibration process of building energy model based on schedule tuning and signed directed graph (SDG) method, which codifies human experience and logic and incorporates them into the modules of computational calibration to combine the advantages of traditional and automated approach. The specific operations of calibration process are introduced through a case study. In this case, a building energy model with relatively low accuracy is finally well calibrated. The CV(RMSE) (Coefficient of Variation of Root Mean Square Error) of the original model is 42.12% for power consumption and 25.50% for gas consumption; and for the calibrated model, the CV(RMSE) is 2.21% for power consumption and 3.15% for gas consumption. In addition, the same operations are also applied to another case for further verification. In this case, the final CV(RMSE) of power consumption is reduced to 2.19% from 19.25%. This significant result reveals the applicability and effectiveness of the automated process.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 102058 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | Journal of Building Engineering |
Volume | 35 |
Early online date | 2 Dec 2020 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Mar 2021 |
MoE publication type | A1 Journal article-refereed |
Keywords
- building simulation
- model calibration
- HVAC system
- schedule
- signed directed graph (SDG)