TY - JOUR
T1 - Adaptation by the least vulnerable
T2 - Managing climate and disaster risks in Finland
AU - Pilli-Sihvola, Karoliina
AU - Harjanne, Atte
AU - Haavisto, Riina
PY - 2018/10
Y1 - 2018/10
N2 - Disaster risk reduction (DRR) and climate change adaptation (CCA) literature has traditionally focused on the countries and regions hit hardest by natural hazards. In this paper, we take a different perspective by turning our eyes upon Finland, a Nordic welfare state and a low vulnerability and exposure society. We analyse and discuss how well the existing DRR and CCA approaches reflect the perspective of the least vulnerable countries and whether the current ways of determining vulnerability and exposure neglect some risks or hinder the seizing opportunities brought by climate change.This paper is based on data gathered in a survey, interviews and workshops in two research projects which analysed weather and climate related risks in Finland. We conclude that disaster risk assessments need to be contingent and account for social and economic contexts. In an institutionally well-functioning welfare society, vulnerability assessments should emphasize relative changes in perceived social trends and social cohesion. Exposure should not be limited to direct geographical or physical exposure to local natural hazards. Successful opportunity identification can help improve DRR at home and abroad. In general, the role of political systems and culture as enabling factors for DRR and CCA need further study.
AB - Disaster risk reduction (DRR) and climate change adaptation (CCA) literature has traditionally focused on the countries and regions hit hardest by natural hazards. In this paper, we take a different perspective by turning our eyes upon Finland, a Nordic welfare state and a low vulnerability and exposure society. We analyse and discuss how well the existing DRR and CCA approaches reflect the perspective of the least vulnerable countries and whether the current ways of determining vulnerability and exposure neglect some risks or hinder the seizing opportunities brought by climate change.This paper is based on data gathered in a survey, interviews and workshops in two research projects which analysed weather and climate related risks in Finland. We conclude that disaster risk assessments need to be contingent and account for social and economic contexts. In an institutionally well-functioning welfare society, vulnerability assessments should emphasize relative changes in perceived social trends and social cohesion. Exposure should not be limited to direct geographical or physical exposure to local natural hazards. Successful opportunity identification can help improve DRR at home and abroad. In general, the role of political systems and culture as enabling factors for DRR and CCA need further study.
KW - Adaptation
KW - Climate change
KW - Disaster risk reduction
KW - Finland
KW - Governance
KW - Welfare state
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042277877&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.12.004
DO - 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.12.004
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85042277877
SN - 2212-4209
VL - 31
SP - 1266
EP - 1275
JO - International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
JF - International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
ER -