Abstract
The influence of Poisson noise on the accuracy of x-ray reflectivity analysis
is studied with an aluminium oxide (AlO) layer on silicon. A null
hypothesis which argues that other than the exact solution gives the best
fitness is examined with a statistical p-value test using a significance level of
α = 0.01. Simulations are performed for a fit instead of a measurement
since the exact error caused by noise cannot be determined from the
measurement. The p-value is studied by comparing trial curves to 1000
‘measurements’, each of them including synthetic Poisson noise.
Confidence limits for the parameters of Parratt’s formalism and the
Nevot–Croce approximation are determined in (mass density, surface
roughness), (thickness, surface roughness) and (thickness, mass density)
planes. The most significant result is that the thickness determination
accuracy of AlO is approximately ±0.09 nm but the accuracy is better for
materials having higher mass density. It is also shown that the accuracy of
mass density determination can be significantly improved using a suitably
designed fitness measure. Although the power of the presented method is
demonstrated only in one case, it can be used in any parameter region for a
plethora of single layer systems to find the lower limit of the error made in
x-ray reflectivity analysis.
is studied with an aluminium oxide (AlO) layer on silicon. A null
hypothesis which argues that other than the exact solution gives the best
fitness is examined with a statistical p-value test using a significance level of
α = 0.01. Simulations are performed for a fit instead of a measurement
since the exact error caused by noise cannot be determined from the
measurement. The p-value is studied by comparing trial curves to 1000
‘measurements’, each of them including synthetic Poisson noise.
Confidence limits for the parameters of Parratt’s formalism and the
Nevot–Croce approximation are determined in (mass density, surface
roughness), (thickness, surface roughness) and (thickness, mass density)
planes. The most significant result is that the thickness determination
accuracy of AlO is approximately ±0.09 nm but the accuracy is better for
materials having higher mass density. It is also shown that the accuracy of
mass density determination can be significantly improved using a suitably
designed fitness measure. Although the power of the presented method is
demonstrated only in one case, it can be used in any parameter region for a
plethora of single layer systems to find the lower limit of the error made in
x-ray reflectivity analysis.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 7497-7501 |
Number of pages | 5 |
Journal | Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics |
Volume | 40 |
Issue number | 23 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 16 Nov 2007 |
MoE publication type | A1 Journal article-refereed |
Keywords
- atomic layer deposition
- confidence limits
- curve fitting
- x-ray relectivity