Abstract
This study investigates whether business scholars’ moral posture is related to their productivity in terms of peer-reviewed publications and research funds. We distinguish between deontological and consequentialist moral postures and take account of the moderating role of researchers’ perceived autonomy and the competition between them. The empirical results show that strong moral postures do not diminish research productivity. Both perceived autonomy and competition foster researchers’ productivity. Interestingly, a deontological moral posture fosters researchers’ productivity in contexts of low competition, but diminishes it in highly competitive settings. The findings suggest that measures for ethical governance in research need to consider not only the moral posture that underlies researchers’ ethical decision making, but also the institutional environment in which researchers are embedded.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Academy of Management Annual Meeting 2017 |
Publisher | Academy of Management (AOM) |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jan 2017 |
MoE publication type | A4 Article in a conference publication |
Event | Academy of Management Annual Meeting: At the Interface - Atlanta, United States Duration: 4 Aug 2017 → 8 Aug 2017 Conference number: 77 |
Publication series
Name | Academy of Management Proceedings |
---|---|
Publisher | Academy of Management |
Number | 1 |
Volume | 2017 |
ISSN (Electronic) | 2151-6561 |
Other
Other | Academy of Management Annual Meeting |
---|---|
Abbreviated title | AOM |
Country | United States |
City | Atlanta |
Period | 04/08/2017 → 08/08/2017 |