Ability to count messages is worth Θ(Δ) rounds in distributed computing

Tuomo Lempiäinen

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference article in proceedingsScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Hella et al. (PODC 2012, Distributed Computing 2015) identified seven different message-passing models of distributed computing – one of which is the port-numbering model – and provided a complete classification of their computational power relative to each other. However, their method for simulating the ability to count incoming messages causes an additive overhead of 2Δ–2 communication rounds, and it was not clear if this is actually optimal. In this paper we give a positive answer, by using bisimulation as our main tool: there is a matching linear-in-Δ lower bound. This closes the final gap in our understanding of the models, with respect to the number of communication rounds. By a previously identified connection to modal logic, our result has implications to the relationship between multimodal logic and graded multimodal logic.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 31st Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science
Place of PublicationNew York, NY, USA
PublisherACM
Pages357-366
ISBN (Electronic)978-1-4503-4391-6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Jul 2016
MoE publication typeA4 Conference publication
EventAnnual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science - New York, United States
Duration: 5 Jul 20168 Jul 2016
Conference number: 31

Publication series

NameAnnual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science
PublisherACM/IEEE
ISSN (Print)1043-6871

Conference

ConferenceAnnual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science
Abbreviated titleLICS
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityNew York
Period05/07/201608/07/2016

Keywords

  • distributed computing
  • port-numbering model
  • local algorithms
  • lower bounds
  • bisimulation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ability to count messages is worth Θ(Δ) rounds in distributed computing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this