Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A Curated Debate: On Using “Templates” in Qualitative Research

  • Denny Gioia*
  • , Kevin Corley
  • , Kathleen Eisenhardt
  • , Martha Feldman
  • , Ann Langley
  • , Jane Lê
  • , Karen Golden-Biddle
  • , Karen Locke
  • , Jacqueline Mees-Buss
  • , Rebecca Piekkari
  • , Davide Ravasi
  • , Claus Rerup
  • , Torsten Schmid
  • , David Silverman
  • , Catherine Welch
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Pennsylvania State University
  • Imperial College London
  • Stanford University
  • University of California, Irvine
  • HEC Montreal
  • Otto Beisheim School of Management
  • Boston University
  • College of William and Mary
  • University of New South Wales
  • University College London
  • University of St. Gallen
  • Goldsmiths, University of London
  • Trinity College Dublin
  • Frankfurt School of Finance and Management

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

98 Citations (Scopus)
2175 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

One of the raging debates in organization study concerns the use of “templates” in qualitative research. This curated debate brings together many of the players in that debate, who make statements of position relative to the issues involved and trade accusations and counter-accusations about statements they have made that in their view have been misinterpreted or misconstrued. Overall, it is quite a lively debate that reveals positions, points of tension and grounds for disagreement. Denny Gioia wrote the triggering essay that prompted other players to weigh in with their personal and professional views.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)231-252
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Management Inquiry
Volume31
Issue number3
Early online date12 May 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2022
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Keywords

  • Gioia method
  • qualitative methods
  • templates

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Curated Debate: On Using “Templates” in Qualitative Research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this